Pricing for



Townhome Policy Compliance (HO-6 vs HO-3) Review



(All pricing assumes advisory-only, no enforcement, no coverage determination.)

Clients who have completed the AI-powered Coverage Intelligence Report receive a $197 credit toward any in-person service.

1️⃣ Association-Level Review (Most Common)



Policy Structure & Governing Document Review



$500-$2,500



Includes:

  • Review of declaration, bylaws, and plat (insurance sections only) Determination of fee-simple vs condominium structure (document-based)

  • Identification of intended owner insurance responsibility

  • HO-6 vs HO-3 alignment analysis

  • Includes 10 Free Resident Insurance policy reviews

🧠 This alone often solves 80% of board confusion.



2️⃣ Homeowner Documentation

Limited Sampling Review

$20 per unit (10 unit minimum)

Includes:

  • Review of owner policy declarations page

  • Confirmation of policy form (HO-6 vs HO-3)

  • Identification of mismatches (no coverage opinions) ✔ Ideal when boards don’t want to review every unit initially

Full Community Review

$10 per unit (50+ units)

Best for:

  • Large townhome communities

  • Prior claims or disputes

  • Transition from developer control

3️⃣ Bundled HOA Service Packages

Townhome Insurance Clarity Package

$500-$2,500

Includes:

  • Governing document review

  • HO-6 vs HO-3 determination

  • Up to 25 homeowner policy reviews

  • Board summary

  • Homeowner education handout Comprehensive Townhome Compliance Review

$2,500 – $8,500

Includes:

  • Document review

  • Community-wide policy sampling (25% of total participating residences minimum)

  • Risk categorization

  • Education materials

  • Optional board presentation

4️⃣ Annual / Ongoing Compliance Support

Annual Advisory Retainer

$1,250 – $3,000/year

Includes:

  • Policy questions from management

  • New owner guidance language

  • Annual update memo

  • Quarterly spot checks

5️⃣ Board Education Sessions (Optional Add-On)

30-60 minute board workshop:

$1,250 – $2,500

Highly effective for:

  • Heated HO-6 vs HO-3 debates

  • New boards

  • Management transitions